The Japanese Association of School Health

Original Article

ISSN ONLINE : 1880-2400

[School Health Vol.13, 11-19, 2017]

Development of School and Neighborhood Collective Efficacy Scales for Use in Japanese Adolescent Health Research

Minoru Takakura*, Masaya Miyagi**, Masaru Ueji***, Minoru Kobayashi**** and Atsushi Kurihara*****

  • *Faculty of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus
  • 207 Uehara, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0215 Japan
  • minoru@med.u-ryukyu.ac.jp
  • **Faculty of Education, University of the Ryukyus
  • 1 Senbaru, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan
  • ***Faculty of Education, Ibaraki University
  • 2-1-1 Bunkyo, Mito, Ibaraki 310-8512 Japan
  • ****Graduate School of Education, University of the Ryukyus
  • 1 Senbaru, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan
  • *****Faculty of Education, Saga University
  • 1 Honjo-machi, Saga, 840-8502, Japan

Received December 22, 2016 ; Accepted May 12, 2017

Keywords:
social determinants, social relationships, high school students

Free PDF

Abstracts

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to develop self-rating school and neighborhood collective efficacy scales for use in Japanese adolescents and to assess the psychometric properties of the scales.

Methods: Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 1,471 students in grades 10 through 12 in six public high schools in Japan in 2015. The collective efficacy questionnaire comprised of social cohesion in school (7 items), social cohesion in the neighborhood (5 items), informal social control in school (7 items), and informal social control in the neighborhood (6 items). Factor analysis was used to evaluate the construct validity of the scales. The predictive validity was examined using the associations with safety at school and neighborhood and self-rated health and K6. Scale reliability was assessed based on internal consistency.

Results: Factor analysis confirmed that collective efficacy constructs among Japanese adolescents consisted of collective efficacy factors in school and neighborhood with social cohesion and informal social control subordinate factors. The scales had good internal consistency (more than 0.9 of Cronbach’s alphas). The collective efficacy scales, as expected, were associated with safety at school and in the neighborhood and subjective health, indicating appropriate predictive validity.

Conclusions: The present findings show the reliability and validity of the school and neighborhood collective efficacy scales for Japanese adolescents.

References

  • 1) Inaba Y: What’s Wrong with Social Capital? Critiques from Social Science. In: Kawachi I, Takao S, Subramanian SV eds. Global Perspectives on Social Capital and Health. 323–342, Springer, New York, NY, 2013
  • 2) Kawachi I, Takao S, Subramanian SV: Introduction. In: Kawachi I, Takao S, Subramanian SV eds. Global Perspectives on Social Capital and Health. 1–21, Springer, New York, NY, 2013
  • 3) Sampson RJ: The neighborhood context of well-being. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46: S53–64, 2003
  • 4) Suen Y, Cerin E, Mellecker RR: Development and reliability of a scale of physical-activity related informal social control for parents of Chinese pre-schoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 11: 1–10, 2014
  • 5) Cohen DA, Finch BK, Bower A et al.: Collective efficacy and obesity: The potential influence of social factors on health. Social Science & Medicine 62: 769–78, 2006
  • 6) Bandura A: Collective efficacy. In: Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. 477–525, W.H. Freeman, New York, NY, 1997
  • 7) Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F: Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277: 918–924, 1997
  • 8) Drukker M, Kaplan C, Feron F et al.: Children’s health-related quality of life, neighbourhood socio-economic deprivation and social capital. A contextual analysis. Social Science & Medicine 57: 825–841, 2003
  • 9) Drukker M, Buka SL, Kaplan C et al.: Social capital and young adolescents’ perceived health in different sociocultural settings. Social Science & Medicine 61: 185–198, 2005
  • 10) Kim J: Influence of neighbourhood collective efficacy on adolescent sexual behaviour: Variation by gender and activity participation. Child: Care, Health and Development 36: 646–654, 2010
  • 11) Leslie HH, Ahern J, Pettifor AE et al.: Collective efficacy, alcohol outlet density, and young men’s alcohol use in rural South Africa. Health & Place 34: 190–198, 2015
  • 12) Fagan AA, Wright EM, Pinchevsky GM: The protective effects of neighborhood collective efficacy on adolescent substance use and violence following exposure to violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 43: 1498–1512, 2014
  • 13) West P, Sweeting H, Leyland A: School effects on pupils’ health behaviours: Evidence in support of the health promoting school. Research Papers in Education 19: 261–291, 2004
  • 14) Goddard RD: Collective efficacy: A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 93: 467–476, 2001
  • 15) Olsson G, Fritzell J: A multilevel study on ethnic and socioeconomic school stratification and health-related behaviors among students in Stockholm. Journal of School Health 85: 871–879, 2015
  • 16) Sapouna M: Collective efficacy in the school context: Does it help explain victimization and bullying among Greek primary and secondary school students? Journal of Interpersonal Violence 25: 1912–1927, 2010
  • 17) Hume C, Jorna M, Arundell L et al.: Are children’s perceptions of neighbourhood social environments associated with their walking and physical activity? Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 12: 637–641, 2009
  • 18) Takakura M, Hamabata Y, Ueji M et al.: Measurement of social capital at school and neighborhood among young people. School Health 10: 1–8, 2014
  • 19) Ahern J, Galea S: Collective efficacy and major depression in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Epidemiology 173:1453–1462, 2011
  • 20) Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ et al.: Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in nonspecific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine 32: 959–976, 2002
  • 21) Furukawa TA, Kawakami N, Saitoh M et al.: The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 17: 152–158, 2008
  • 22) Jackson N, Denny S, Sheridan J et al.: The role of neighborhood disadvantage, physical disorder, and collective efficacy in adolescent alcohol use: A multilevel path analysis. Health & Place 41: 24–33, 2016
  • 23) Dunn EC, Masyn KE, Johnston WR et al.: Modeling contextual effects using individual-level data and without aggregation: an illustration of multilevel factor analysis (MLFA) with collective efficacy. Population Health Metrics 13: 12, 2015

▲ Go to top of page